Price per billing period clearly stated

Displaying an annual plan as '$24/month' without disclosing the $290 annual charge is a documented deceptive pattern under FTC Negative Option Rule (2025): the consumer commits to a $290 lump-sum charge while believing they authorized a $24 monthly payment. The FTC's Dot Com Disclosures guidance (2013) classifies missing-period qualifiers as material omissions. California ARL reinforces this by requiring the 'initial subscription fee' be clearly stated. A missing billing period label on a $29 price is the lowest-friction compliance gap in this category — one additional span element fixes it.

Standardize every price display component to render billing period and, for annual plans, the actual annual charge. In components/PriceDisplay.tsx:

// Annual plan shown as monthly equivalent — must also show annual total
return (
  <div className="price-display">
    <div>
      <span className="price">${monthlyEquivalent}</span>
      <span className="period">/ month</span>
    </div>
    <p className="annual-note text-sm text-gray-600">
      Billed as ${annualPrice}/year
    </p>
  </div>
)

Run a search across src/ for bare price strings (e.g., \$29) not followed by /month or /year to catch any component that bypasses the shared display component. Report the count of pricing surfaces audited.