Continuous monitoring plan documented
Why it matters
Without a continuous monitoring plan, security controls degrade silently after initial deployment: certificates expire, dependency vulnerabilities accumulate, access logs fill with anomalies no one reviews, and permission creep goes undetected. NIST 800-53 rev5 CA-7 (Continuous Monitoring) is a cornerstone FISMA control that requires defined monitoring frequency, event types, and review schedules; AU-6 (Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting) mandates regular review of audit logs. FedRAMP rev5 CA-7 requires monthly vulnerability scans and annual penetration testing with documented results. CMMC 2.0 CA.L2-3.12.3 mandates a continuous monitoring strategy. A security posture that was compliant at ATO can drift out of compliance within weeks without a documented monitoring cadence.
Severity rationale
Info because an undocumented monitoring plan does not introduce a new vulnerability but guarantees that existing controls erode undetected — an assessor will cite its absence as a CA-7 control deficiency.
Remediation
Create docs/continuous-monitoring-plan.md specifying tools, event types, review cadence, and escalation tiers. Reference actual tool names already deployed in your stack.
# Continuous Monitoring Plan
## Monitoring Tools
- Logs: Vercel Log Drains → Datadog (or CloudWatch)
- Uptime: Checkly or Better Uptime — 1-minute ping interval
- Vulnerability scanning: `npm audit` in CI on every PR; Snyk weekly full scan
- Dependency updates: Dependabot (daily, security-updates group)
## Events Monitored
1. Failed login attempts (threshold: >10/min per IP → P1 alert)
2. Privilege escalation (any role change → immediate Slack alert)
3. Unrecognized admin session (new device + admin role → P1)
4. 5xx error rate spike (>5% over 5-minute window → P2)
5. Dependency CVE published for a direct dependency → P2
6. Certificate expiry <30 days → P2
## Review Cadence
- **Daily:** Automated alert triage; Datadog error dashboard
- **Weekly:** Vulnerability scan results; access log anomaly review
- **Monthly:** Full audit log review; user access recertification; FedRAMP ConMon report
## Escalation Levels
- **P1 (Critical):** PagerDuty → on-call engineer within 15 minutes; incident response activated
- **P2 (High):** Slack #security → acknowledged within 4 hours; remediated within 7 days
- **P3 (Medium):** Ticket created; remediated within 30 days
- **P4 (Low):** Logged; reviewed at next monthly security sync
DetectionPro
The detection method for this pattern is part of AuditBuffet Pro.
The full method (what to look for, pass and fail conditions, and how results get reported) ships inside the FISMA/FedRAMP Readiness Audit. The pattern definition, severity rationale, and remediation remain openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
External references
- nist:rev5 · CA-7 — Continuous Monitoring
- nist:rev5 · AU-6 — Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
- fedramp:rev5 · CA-7 — FedRAMP CA-7 — ConMon strategy and plan
- cmmc:2.0 · CA.L2-3.12.3 — Monitor security controls on an ongoing basis
Taxons
History
- 2026-04-18·v1.0.0·Initial import from gov-fisma-fedramp·automated